Shared decision making in the ED: ethical considerations


      The process of shared decision making (SDM) is an ethical imperative in the physician-patient relationship, especially in the emergency department (ED), where SDM can present unique challenges because patients and emergency physicians often have no established relationship and decisions about diagnosis, treatment, and disposition are time dependent. SDM should be guided by the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice and the related principle of stewardship of finite resources. The objective of this article is to outline the ethical considerations of SDM in the ED in the context of diagnostic evaluations, therapeutic interventions, disposition decisions, and conflict resolution and to explore strategies for reaching decision consensus. Several cases are presented to highlight the ethical principles in SDM in the ED. SDM is an important approach to diagnostic testing in the ED. Achieving agreement regarding diagnostic evaluations requires a balance of respect for patient autonomy and stewardship of resources. SDM regarding ED therapeutic interventions is an important component of the balance of respect for patient autonomy and beneficence. While respecting patient autonomy, emergency physicians also recognize the importance of the application of professional judgment to achieve the best possible outcome for patients. SDM as an ethical imperative in the context of ED disposition is especially important because of the frequent ambiguity of equipoise in these situations. Unique clinical situations such as pediatric patients or patients who lack decisional capacity merit special consideration.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Kon AA
        • Davidson JE
        • Morrison W
        • Danis M
        • White DB
        Shared decision making in ICUs: an American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.
        Crit Care Med. 2016; 44: 188-201
        • Charles C
        • Gafni A
        • Whelan T
        Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango).
        Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44: 681-692
        • Institute of Medicine
        Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.
        National Academies Press, Washington, DC2001
        • Pham JC
        • Trueger NS
        • Hilton J
        • Khare RK
        • Smith JP
        • Bernstein SL
        Interventions to improve patient-centered care during times of emergency department crowding.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18: 1289-1294
        • Barry MJ
        • Edgman-Levitan S
        Shared decision making—the pinnacle of patient-centered care.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 780-781
        • Hess EP
        • Grudzen CR
        • Thomson R
        • Raja AS
        • Carpenter CR
        Shared decision-making in the emergency department: respecting patient autonomy when seconds count.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2015; 22: 856-864
        • Stiggelbout AM
        • Van der Weijden T
        • De Wit MPT
        • Frosch D
        • Legare F
        • Montori VM
        • et al.
        Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare.
        BMJ. 2012; 344: e256
        • Stacey D
        • Légaré F
        • Col NF
        • Bennett CL
        • Barry MJ
        • Eden KB
        • et al.
        Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28; 1: CD001431
        • Sarela AI
        Stop sitting on the fence: recommendations are essential to informed decision making.
        BMJ. 2013; 347: f7600
        • American College of Emergency Physicians
        Code of ethics for emergency physicians.
        ([Available at: Accesed 1/28/2016])
        • Scheunemann LP
        • Cunningham TV
        • Arnold RM
        • Buddadhumaruk P
        • White DB
        How clinicians discuss critically ill patients' preferences and values and surrogates: an empirical analysis.
        Crit Care Med. 2015; 43: 757-764
        • Wenger NS
        • Phillips RS
        • Teno JM
        • Oye RK
        • Dawson NV
        • Liu H
        • et al.
        Physician understanding of patient resuscitation preferences: insights and clinical implications.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48: S44-S51
        • Beach MC
        • Morrison RS
        The effect of do-not-resuscitate orders on physician decision-making.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002; 50: 2057-2061
        • Shalowitz DI
        • Garrett-Mayer E
        • Wendler D
        The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.
        Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166: 493-497
        • Marco CA
        • Schears RM
        Societal preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2002; 20: 207-211
        • Hamel MB
        • Lynn J
        • Teno JM
        • Covinsky KE
        • Wu AW
        • Galanos A
        • et al.
        Age-related differences in care preferences, treatment decisions, and clinical outcomes of seriously ill hospitalized adults: lessons from SUPPORT.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48: 76-82
        • Silviera M
        • DiPiero A
        • Gerrity M
        • Feudtner C
        Patients' knowledge of options at the end-of-life: ignorance in the face of death.
        JAMA. 2000; 284: 2483-2488
        • Taylor DM
        • Ugoni AM
        • Cameron PA
        • McNeil JJ
        Advance directives and emergency department patients: ownership rates and perceptions of use.
        Intern Med J. 2003; 33: 586-592
        • Tulsky JA
        Beyond advance directives: importance of communication skills at the end-of-life.
        JAMA. 2005; 294: 359-365
        • Doyle CJ
        • Post H
        • Burney RE
        • Maino J
        • Keefe M
        • Rhee KJ
        Family participation during resuscitation: an option.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1987; 16: 673-675
        • Hanson C
        • Strawser D
        Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Foote hospital emergency department's nine-year perspective.
        J Emerg Nurs. 1992; 18: 104-106
        • McClenathan BM
        • Torrington KG
        • Uyehara CFT
        Family member presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a survey of US and international critical care professionals.
        Chest. 2002; 122: 2204-2211
        • Robinson SM
        • Mackenzie-Ross S
        • Campbell Hewson GL
        • Egleston CV
        • Prevost AT
        Psychological effect of witnessed resuscitation on bereaved relatives.
        Lancet. 1998; 352: 614-617
        • Jabre P
        • Belpomme V
        • Azoulay E
        • Jacob L
        • Bertrand L
        • Lapostolle F
        • et al.
        Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
        N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 1008-1018
        • Mcmahon-Parkes K
        • Moule P
        • Benger J
        • Albarran JW
        The views and preferences of resuscitated and non-resuscitated patients towards family-witnessed resuscitation: a qualitative study.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2009; 46: 220-229
        • Boudreaux ED
        • Francis JL
        • Loyacano T
        Family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitations in the emergency department: a critical review and suggestions for future research.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 40: 193-205
        • Bradley C
        • Lensky M
        • Brasel K
        Implementation of a family presence during resuscitation protocol #233.
        J Palliat Med. 2011; 14: 98-99
        • Katz SJ
        • Hawley S
        The value of sharing treatment decision making with patients: expecting too much?.
        JAMA. 2013; 310: 1559-1560
        • Henderson DP
        • Knapp JF
        Report of the National Consensus Conference on family presence during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation and procedures.
        J Emerg Nurs. 2006; 32: 23-29
        • Kanzaria HK
        • Brook RH
        • Probst MA
        • Harris D
        • Berry SH
        • Hoffman JR
        Emergency physicians perceptions of shared decision-making.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2015; 22: 399-405
        • O'Connor AM
        • Wennberg JE
        • Legare F
        • Llewellyn-Thomas HA
        • Moulton BW
        • Sepucha KR
        • et al.
        Toward the ‘tipping point’: decision aids and informed patient choice.
        Health Aff. 2007; 716–25
        • Flynn D
        • Knoedler MA
        • Hess EP
        • Murad MH
        • Erwin PJ
        • Montori VM
        • et al.
        Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared-decision making: a systematic review.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2012; 19: 959-967
        • Chen JC
        • Cooper RJ
        • Lopez-O'Sullivan A
        • Schriger DL
        Measuring patient tolerance for future adverse events in low-risk emergency department chest pain patients.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2014; 64: 127-136
        • Probst M.A.
        • Kanzaria H.K.
        • Frosch D.L.
        • Hess E.P.
        • Winkel G.
        • Ngai K.M.
        • et al.
        Perceived appropriateness of shared decision-making in the emergency department: a survey study.
        Acad EmergMed. 2016; 23: 375-381
        • Isaacs CG
        • Kistler C
        • Hunold KM
        • Pereira GF
        • Buchbinder M
        • Weaver MA
        • et al.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013; 61: 793-798
        • Varma S
        • Wendler D
        Medical decision making for patients without surrogates.
        Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167: 1711-1715
        • Sibley A
        • Pollard AJ
        • Fitzpatrick R
        • Sheehan M
        Developing a new justification for assent.
        BMC Med Ethics. 2016; 17: 2
        • American Academy of Pediatrics
        Committee on bioethics: informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice.
        Pediatrics. 1995; 95: 314
        • Lee KJ
        • Havens PL
        • Sato TT
        • Hoffman GM
        • Leuthner SR
        Assent for treatment: clinician knowledge, attitudes, and practice.
        Pediatrics. 2006; 118: 723-730
        • Unguru Y
        Making sense of adolescent decision-making: challenge and reality.
        Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2011; 22 ([vii-viii]): 195-206
        • Goold SD
        • Williams B
        • Arnold RM
        Conflicts regarding decisions to limit treatment: a differential diagnosis.
        JAMA. 2000; 283: 909-914
        • American Medical Association Code of Medical Ethics
        Potential patients.
        ([Available at: Accessed 1/28/2016])
        • American Medical Association Code of Medical Ethics
        Invalid medical treatment.
        ([Available at: Accessed 1/28/2016])
        • American College of Emergency Physicians
        Clinical policy: Nonbeneficial (‘futile”) emergency medical interventions.
        ([Available at: Accessed 1/28/2016])
        • American Medical Association Code of Ethics
        Opinion 2.035 – futile care.
        ([Available at: Accessed 1/28/2016])
        • Kuppermann N
        • Holmes JF
        • Dayan PS
        • Hoyle Jr., JD
        • Atabaki SM
        • Holubkov R
        • et al.
        Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study.
        Lancet. 2009; 374: 1160-1170
        • Griffey R.T.
        • Shah M.N.
        What we talk about when we talk about SDM.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2016; 23: 493-494
        • Moulton B
        • King JS
        Aligning ethics with medical decision-making: the quest for informed patient choice.
        J Law Med Ethics. 2010; 38: 85-97